It’s a story about a family consist of a father, mother and
a son. One day the father named Ted Naracott goes for a horse auction and gets a horse from the
auction for 30 Guinea. The horse is given to his son named Albert. he gives the horse name as joey. joey learn lots of things with albert until his dad don't have any money to pay the bills and send joey to the military to join the war that is happening in a sudden. so then he is sold to captain Nicholl who promise that after the war he will return joey to Albert bit in the middle of the war, Captain Nicholl died shoot by the opposite. then he met 2 guys who go for a war and the guys trying to save him but because of saving him they get shot by the commander. soon through the war, we can see that joey meet emily on the way and she is trying to save him and his friend from going to the war but he is captured by the military. he got back to the england army and getting a hard job to drag the canon. then his friend died. around 4 years finally albert go to the war then accidentally meet joey that was sick near the end of the war. after the war end, because joey is not the officer's horse he wants to be auctioned again. shocking, it is shocking because there is emily's grandfather also there to buy joey. albert's friends help him to get joey back by giving all their money but emily's grandfather still win. after argument with the grandfather, we know that emily has died. in the end albert get joey back and went home to devon
Thursday, 28 November 2013
Thursday, 14 November 2013
Reflection Unit 2
in this unit, i learn how to write a good argumentative essay and also how to have a debate. when doing the argumentative essay, i don't think i do the essay good enough because i can't manage my grammar mistakes and also i need to make my argument clear and strong enough to make it fierce. when i have the debate, i can't look at the examiner because its really a nerve wrecking moment for me to see the examiner in their eyes. i got my argument simple but i am satisfied with it. the result of both of the assessment are pretty good but i will try to get better in the next unit
Thursday, 17 October 2013
Who is Responsible?
It have been a large amount of issue that every year in Indonesia,
many people have an accident and gotten into jail because they are the victims
and also the guilty people that are arrested because of the underage driving. These
days, it’s being a hot topic that a celebrity’s son that is only 13 years old
and did not have a driving license drives and crash its car that get 7 people
dies and many people injured. I think the father also needs to be responsible
of his son’s act because he is the one who raise the child.
We all know that the kid is the one who drives. He droves
from Jakarta to bogor and vice versa and it means he passed the border that parted
Jakarta and the west java. I don’t think that the dad didn’t know that he would
drive to it and in the Internet, it is stated that he should be at a wedding.
Even though if he ditch the wedding, the father would have know that the kid
was not there so then he becomes panic and quickly searching for his child
because it’s a dad’s reflex to find for his child when he is not there.
People said that he swerved the car and lose control. As we
all know, there is a quotation says that “like mother like son” because he is
not with his mother because of the divorce, so it’s the dad who shows examples
to his kids including how to drive. I think its also the dad’s fault that the
kid swerved because probably his dad shows and teach him how to swerved and
told him and make him feel swerving is a combination of driving that should be
tried. He also think that it is a good thing to do and its okay to try without
thinking about the consequences of doing it because he is foolish.
We could blame the father because he is the one who gives
him the car. Even if its stated that he is using his brother’s car but still,
the one who bought the car is his dad and the car is bought under his name. He,
as the father need to realize that his children are all still underage and its
not good to be given a car because they still take driving as a joke and game
that he can play to show off and also to have fun.
I think its his father’s fault that this accident happens
but, it is not a full fault on his father because the kid is the one who drives
and control the car. We need to hear for further information weather both of
them will be guilty or only one of them who will be guilty until the police and
the lawyers gives an official statement.
Sunday, 29 September 2013
Report to Arthur's Death
To the chief of police,
When we arrived at the scene of crime at the private estate
of the Volupides family located on the 4th Avenue at 02:00 on the 24th
of August 1970, we were greeted by a body that was later identified as Arthur
Volupides lying on his back, face up on the foot of the stairs with legs
hanging on the third stair and Queenie, his wife, beside the body. A glass was
still gripped in his hand and the stove was on. Arthur was dressed in formal and
was wearing a robe on top.
Queenie said that, “Something terrible happened. Arthur slipped
and fell on the stairs. He was coming down for another drink–he still had the
glass in his hand–and I think he’s dead. Oh, my God–what shall I do? ”
The autopsy result of Arthur Volupides confirmed that Arthur
had died from a wound and stated that he had been drunk.
We have concluded that Queenie’s story does not match the
evidence that we have found.
First of all, the glass in his possession was not broken.
When a person falls down, the object they’re holding usually breaks or the
other possible outcome is that you usually let go of that object as a
protective reflex. The second evidence we got was that the object on the wall
was not misplaced. The rule is that when someone falls down they would usually try
to grab hold of something nearby to prevent theirselves from falling. The
staircase carpet was not messed up which was illogical because when someone
falls down carpet covered stairs; the carpet usually would be rumpled because
of the friction. The biggest lead we’ve got is that victim was found lying on
the floor, face up, while usually when someone falls downstairs, they would
fall face first and the paramedics that would usually be called when someone
experiences an accident, were not present.
After seeing all of the evidence, we can say that Queenie’s
was lying and she will need to be interrogated for further investigation. If
she’s proved to be guilty we will continue investigating and bring it to court.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)